Now and Later

In my previous post, I mentioned St. Therese of Lisieux, and how she embraced the little irritations of life as part of picking up her cross and following Christ, and applied that to all of the little irritations one might encounter at church on Sunday.

One might well ask, “But why go to a mass/service/church where you find the liturgy irritating on a regular basis?” And one would be right to do so. I’m a software engineer by profession; and like any engineer I think problems are for solving. We shouldn’t put up with bad situations; rather, we should fix them. But there’s an important distinction to be drawn here, that of the present moment vs. the future, or, as I put it in the title, of Now and Later.

Christ tells us to live in the present moment, and so we must do. And it is precisely in the present moment that we must embrace and offer up the annoyances and irritations that come our way, while at the same time attending properly to the present duty. During mass, the present duty is the mass; it is manifestly not fixing the mass. After mass, it might be appropriate to take steps—to talk to the priest, to talk to the mother of the noisy child, to resolve to try a different service. (And then again, it might not be.) It’s in the moment that we must offer up our irritations. Future irritations, I think, may reasonably be avoided.

OK, that’s easy to say….

A Quiet Mass

The Feast of the Immaculate Conception was a couple of weeks ago. It’s a “Holy Day of Obligation”, which means that all Catholics are obligated to attend mass on that day, just as they are on Sundays. As usual, there were a variety of mass times to choose from. The most convenient for our family was at 7:30 PM—except for one little detail. We have four kids, and 7:30 PM is more or less bedtime for all of them. We thought that the older two could behave at that hour, but were concerned about the younger two, especially our three-year-old, and felt that bringing them would make the mass less pleasant for us, and certainly for those sitting near us.

This prompted a question: at what age does the obligation to attend mass kick in? Infants clearly aren’t obligated to attend; so when does it start? I consulted a variety of books I had at home, and did a Google search, and found nothing to the point. Finally I sent a query to Mark Shea. He didn’t know, but he graciously posted it on his blog for his readers’ comments. I got my answer—which, according to canon law, is seven years of age—but the ensuing comments thread became a general discussion of the plusses and minuses of bringing little ones to mass, and in particular the effect of said little ones on the others present.

Here’s a sampling of the points of view (I paraphrase): “We always bring our kids.” “We like to leave the little ones at home; it’s easier to worship that way.” “If you don’t bring them to mass, how will they learn to behave at mass?” “Too many parents don’t make their kids behave at mass.” “Crying babies make it hard to have a quiet, reverent mass.” “It used to be that nobody brought the little ones to mass, but only those who were old enough.” “It used to be that everybody brought the little ones to mass.” The most angry and vehement commenters were those complaining of noisy children and parents who didn’t discipline them properly, thus making it impossible for said commenters to enjoy mass properly. (“Enjoy” isn’t the word the commenters used; I use it for reasons that will be made clear below.)

Now, I have some sympathy with all of these points of view. I prefer to bring all of my kids to church every Sunday; I want them to have lived their Christian lives “from the cradle,” as it were. At the same time, I understand those who complain about crying babies and noisy ill-behaved children, as they can be a serious distraction. And that’s the key issue, really, isn’t it?

My job, as a participant at mass, is to participate fully in the prayers with all my heart, soul, mind, and strength—a tough challenge. As with any kind of prayer, I will be beset with distractions, both internal and external. And I will admit, it is much easier to deal with internal distractions when there are no external distractions. That’s really what the complainers are asking for: an experience of the mass in which there are no external distractions.

As I say, I can understand this. I can have a much more powerful experience of God’s presence when I attend mass on my own than when I go with my entire family, because I don’t need to devote any of my attention to anything but God. But upon reflection, I’ve come to think that seeking this experience above all else, as many of the complainers seem to, is short-sighted.

We aren’t at mass to enjoy it. We are there to find Christ, to worship him, if possible to receive him, to grow in his service. As C.S. Lewis notes in The Screwtape Letters, there are times in our Christian life when God seems very close and times when he seems very distant…and we tend to grow more when we continue to diligently seek him even though he seems far off. Simply put, having to work to seek God, in spite of our inner dryness, is good for us. It’s good exercise.

Second, Christ tells us that we must pick up our cross and follow him. Crosses need not be large. In The Story of a Soul, St. Therese of Lisieux tells of how she offered up to Christ all of the little irritations of life in the convent, indeed, how she embraced them as crosses to carry for her Lord. It seems to me that babies crying during mass can be viewed the same way. And as a father, I strongly believe that the essence of Christian parenting is to joyfully embrace the inconvenience of loving and properly raising my children. That includes bringing them to mass and teaching them how to behave there. It means frequently having a noise and a hubbub in my home at times when I’d much prefer that it be quiet. It means missed opportunities, because I must be available to my children. It is all undeniably worth it. But the sacrifice should not be discounted.

Do I embrace in this way the external distractions I encounter during mass? Well, no. No, I don’t. I get as irritated as anyone else, I’m sure. I love to attend mass on my own, on occasion. But I can see that I’m going to have to try to do so. And of course, that encompasses all of the other petty complaints: music I don’t like, lectors who read poorly, priests who don’t preach well, or who have thick accents.

I’ve a few other thoughts on this, but I think I’d better hold them back for future posts.

That Sucks!

Jen’s been learning about trusting in God and seeking His will when stressed instead of going it alone. There’s good news, and there’s bad news. The good news is, when she’s done this she’s invariably gotten the direction she needs. The bad news is, well, she didn’t like what she was supposed to do:

My prayer to know God’s will was so quickly answered, the path forward so clear. And I thought: “That sucks!”

Alas, the way is narrow, etc. Easy to say, less easy to do what Jen’s doing.

Why Jesus Makes A Difference

Once again, as so often in the few weeks since I discovered Jennifer’s blog, I find that she’s said just what I would have wanted to have said, if I’d been asked the same question, and if I’d been given the grace to understand the answer so well. In this post, she responds to the following comment:

How sad to see that you abandoned reason for faith. would it not be even better if you started living your life as if it mattered in it’s own right and not just so that you could get into a special heavenly club. I think doing good for no other reason then such a selfish desire is despicable.

Jennifer gives a typically detailed and thoughtful response, but the heart of it, for me, is this:

But these concepts — “heaven,” “hell,” “eternity” — are still vague enough in my mind that they don’t motivate me on a gut level. So while I know on an intellectual level that I want to go to heaven and stay out of hell, I have never avoided doing something bad because of the thought, “If I do that I might go to hell!”

There is a very big motivator, however, that is related to the concept of heaven: I don’t want to reject God.

(Emphasis mine.) That’s exactly right. I know that God loves me. How well I know that feeling I get just after I’ve gone out of my way to do something I shouldn’t have done that I know will disappoint Him—that feeling that makes me want to reject God because I don’t want to face Him in my sinfulness. I don’t like that feeling. The hard part is remembering how awful it is before I do whatever it is that I want to do.

Credit where credit is due

A while ago I posted a lengthy series of posts on why Jane and I had chosen to become Roman Catholic. On reflection, I realized that I’d left out an important part of the story.

What I related was my intellectual and spiritual journey, the studying I had done, the thinking and praying I had done, as though I were the active agent in all this. It certainly seemed that way at the time. But in fact, it was the Holy Spirit at work all the time. I followed a path, but I was led along that path, and it seems only fair to say so.

And then, there were many people praying for us as well. I’d like to particularly mention Julie D. of Happy Catholic, who prayed for us when I asked—diligently, over a long period of time, too.

And in the context of people I only know “on-line,” as it were, I find I have to mention the Blessed Virgin Mary and St. Thomas Aquinas, both of whom were sources of aid and comfort to me over the last year.

Regarding St. Thomas Aquinas, I’ve observed that although there are “official” patron saints for all manner of occupations, there is no specified patron for software engineers. The closest is St. Isidore of Seville, the patron saint of the Internet, so named because he wrote one of the first encyclopedias. For my part, I think St. Thomas would be an excellent patron for software folks. As a philosopher and theologian he spent his days building fine distinctions and subtle abstractions into beautiful and coherent cathedrals of thought. Which is, quite literally, what I attempt to do at work every day.

Dear Lord, thank you for your leading. Blessed Mother, St. Thomas, thank you for your prayers.

I had not realized…

…that blogging was mentioned in scripture. But there, right at the beginning of Psalm 144, I find this:

Blessed be the Lord, my rock, who trains my hands for battle, my fingers for war.

And, of course, what else does a blogger rely on but his fingers?

What She Said

Jennifer linked to Aimee Milburn’s story of how she became Catholic; and one paragraph in particular explains what led me back to the Roman Catholic Church. With no wish to offend my friends of other denominations or faiths, this really is what I believe:

I also realized that if I really, really trust Christ, then I must trust his words that he founded the Church, and the gates of hell would not prevail against it – and so they never have. To say that the Catholic Church failed and some ordinary man had to come along and re-found Christianity is to say that Christ failed. That is the implication in what Protestants say – and Mormons, and Jehovah’s Witnesses, and any number of other groups who claim to have “found” the truth that was “lost.” But Christ could not have failed – and he does keep his promises, and always has. I trust that. And history bears it out, if you study the history of the faith in the first 1500 years of Christianity. It did not die out, and there have always been men and women of very great faith in Christ, in every era.

Parish Phone Directories

So Jane had a meeting with the RCIA coordinator today, to talk about the RCIA program; unfortunately, she may be the only person in it this year, which means it won’t do much to help her meet folks. Be that as it may, while they were talking Jane asked if she could get a copy of the parish phone directory—and was met with genuine surprise. Apparently we don’t have a phone directory, and the RCIA coordinator had never heard of such a thing.

So to all the Catholics who might be reading this, is this typical? I know that St. James put together a phone directory with photos of the parishioners twenty-five years or so ago, because I remember getting my picture taken for it, so it isn’t completely unheard of…but are they really that uncommon?

By What Authority, by Mark P. Shea

I mentioned Mark Shea‘s book By What Authority: An Evangelical Discovers Catholic Tradition, in my recent series of posts about becoming Catholic. I read it six months or so ago, and didn’t review it at that time, as it raised issues I wasn’t ready to talk about publicly. I leafed through it while writing that series, and decided it was time to read it again, which I have; and this time I’m going to talk about.

By What Authority is, in some ways, Mark’s own story about becoming Catholic. While yet an Evangelical Christian, Mark came across the work of the so-called “Jesus Seminar”. It was clear that John Dominic Crossan et al were off-base, and particularly so in their inclusion of the Gospel of Thomas in with the canonical four. The canon of scripture is what it is, and can’t be changed. But that led Mark to ask where the canon of scripture itself came from. For a Bible-believing Evangelical, that turns out to be a particularly vexed question.

I won’t try to summarize Mark’s investigations and arguments; it’s an interesting story, well-told, which ends with the firmly supported conclusion that the canon of scripture rests on nothing and nothing but the apostolic tradition received by those who determined which books would be canonical and which would not. And if we accept this apostolic tradition, how can we not accept the other traditions handed down by the apostles and their successors?

Suffice it to say that Mark tells the story (and makes the argument) much better than I would have. Intellectually speaking, this book was instrumental in bringing me home to Rome, and probably more so than anything else I read over the last year.