A couple of days ago, my five-year-old said this:
Monday is Martin Luther King day. But he isn’t a real king, because there aren’t any queens or princesses.
A couple of days ago, my five-year-old said this:
Monday is Martin Luther King day. But he isn’t a real king, because there aren’t any queens or princesses.
We’ve just discovered, as a family, that it’s possible to sing the words of “Jabberwocky” to Beethoven’s Ode to Joy. Heavens.
I’ve not been highly motivated to write book reviews over the past month or so, and so there are a number of books I’ve read that I’ve not reviewed. I thought I’d give ’em a mention and move on.
I am perplexed.
A few weeks ago, some blogger I read recommended a graphic novel called Bone, by Jeff Smith. Bone was originally published as individual comic books in the usual way, and then in a sequence of collections; but the blogger was particularly excited because the entire thing was now being published in one volume.
I’m perplexed, because I just went back to the blog I thought I saw it one, and it’s not there.
But anyway, it looked like fun, and I was in a susceptible mood, and I ordered a copy. And I have to say, I enjoyed it thoroughly. I not infrequently laughed out loud; and unlike Neil Gaiman’s Sandman series, there’s nothing here I’d be unwilling to share with my kids.
I’m trying to figure out how to describe it without giving too much away, and I’m failing. If you like fantasy, and you like things that are funny, it’s well worth your time.
My friend Michael Cleverly sent me a book entitled Mormonism: A Very Short Introduction, by Richard Lyman Bushman (along with
God’s Mechanics, which I reviewed some time ago). It’s a brief book, unsurprisingly; I found it to be sympathetic yet balanced, accentuating the positives about Mormonism without whitewashing the low spots in Mormon history.
I read it with some interest, as we have many Mormon friends and acquaintances, Michael not least, and because my previous exposure to Mormon belief has been minimal. I once read a book on Mormonism, plucked from a friend’s bookshelf in a fit of boredom, that was written by an evangelical Christian of the Dispensationalist variety. It was a highly polemical work, and I’ve never regarded what I read in it as particularly authoritative. So far as that goes, I found the author’s Dispensationalism almost as odd as what he had to say about Mormonism. Consequently I received it gratefully, as an opportunity to correct (or verify) the things I think I know about the religion.
I don’t intend to talk about Mormonism as such here, though I may later; I’ll simply say that it’s different in many ways from what I believe, but that we Catholics could learn a great deal about dedication from them.
…and to all, a Good Night!
My friend Michael Cleverly was kind enough to send me God’s Mechanics, by Brother Guy Consolmagno, S.J. Consolmagno is a Jesuit brother (not a priest); he’s also an astronomer, working at the Vatican Observatory. He describes himself as a “techie”; and he has lots of friends from MIT, the University of Arizona, and a wide variety of other places who are also techies—engineers, scientists, and the like. A fair number of them find his religious faith puzzling, and of those some are genuinely curious how a fellow techie can be religious. How does it work? What’s it all about? Why does he believe it, and what does he get out of it?
Brother Guy wrote this book to answer these questions, writing as a techie for other techies. As he’d be the first to admit (I know this, because he does so), he had to write it as a techie, rather than a theologian; as a theologian, he’s a good astronomer. More than that, he’s not writing to convince; he’s writing to explain.
The thing that surprised me most is how little I match the “techie” pattern that he describes. I mean, I’ve been doing software engineering for two decades, and I’m active in the Tcl/Tk community; surely this qualifies me? But my background is in mathematics and modeling, not in engineering or the hard sciences, and that’s the community he’s really addressing. Maybe it’s just that mathematicians are more used to dealing with eternal verities than engineers and scientists are, I dunno. More than that, though, Brother Guy was writing techies who aren’t religious, a group that I’ve never been in.
My only real complaint about the book is that I think Brother Guy is unduly harsh on Aristotle’s Physics. Newton’s physics are far more useful, but Aristotle wasn’t really addressing the same problem as Newton. But I digress.
If you’re a techie, and you don’t understand how I can possibly be religious, perhaps Brother Guy’s book will help you understand. How well, I’m afraid I really can’t say.
A tongue-in-cheek look at Santa Claus according to the theology of various denominations. I especially liked Baptist Santa. H/T: Fr. Dwight.
My five-year-old daughter and her five-year-old friend Lucy just walked into the room where my older daughter was about to play a video game. Says Lucy:
I want to play a game with you. A queen and princess game. I’m the queen, and you two are the princesses.
To which my five-year-old adds:
And anyway, I have a bracelet.
Wait, what?
Q: How do soccer hooligans do the hokey-pokey?
A: You put the left boot in, you pull the left boot out, you put the left boot in, and you kick him all about…