Unknown's avatar

About wjduquette

Author, software engineer, and Lay Dominican.

The Reapers are the Angels

Julie’s been gushing over Alden Bell’s The Reapers are the Angels for quite some time now. She reviewed it, and then she kept mentioning it, and then she and Scott Daniels started up a new podcast just so that they could talk about it. I listened to the first half of the podcast, right up to the spoiler warning, and was curious enough to find a copy and read it so that I could listen to the second half.

One of the cover blurbs describes the book as “southern gothic: like Flannery O’Connor with zombies.” I can’t speak to that, as I’m not even sure what “southern gothic” is, and I’ve read very little Flannery O’Connor.

But what it is, is a zombie novel, set about twenty-five years after the zombie apocalypse. In Bell’s world, people who die and aren’t properly dispatched will come back as “meatskins”, barely sentient creatures with a taste for human flesh. Meatskins can be killed by destroying their brains; otherwise, they seem to last more or less for ever. Starvation doesn’t kill them, though it slows them down until they are almost inert. It’s clear that meatskins are no longer human, but only animals in human form.

Society has collapsed, naturally. There are little pockets of people here and there, scraping out a living from the remnants and huddling together in fortified buildings at night. And there are a few brave souls who travel about.

One of these is main character, a girl named Temple. She’s fifteen or sixteen, and hence has no memory of the days before the meatskins. She simply accepts them as part of the landscape. She feels uncomfortable with other people (for reasons I won’t go into) and likes to see the wonders that there are in the world; so she travels about. Along the way she kills a man who tries to rape her; the man’s brother feels compelled to avenge him, and the resulting pursuit forms most of the matter of the novel.

The most striking aspect of the novel, for me, is Temple’s approach to life in the world of the Zombies. They are dangerous, certainly, and not to be taken for granted; but they are just one of those things you have to deal with, like (in my world) paying the bills and taking out the trash, just part of the cost of living. In fact, she finds them much easier to deal with than the living, because they are so uncomplicated.

I liked the book; it’s surprisingly quite and peaceful considering the amount of death and destruction and violence it contains. I do have one complaint, from a science-fictional point of view. Early in the book, in an area with no living people other than herself, Temple gets some cheese crackers and soft drinks from an abandoned minimart, and finds a car by the side of the road that she’s able to hot-wire. One gathers that the bulk of the population became zombies in a very short time, leaving the world full of stores that are full of goods and the roads full of cars with tanks full of gasoline, and that the few remaining humans are still living on this stuff. OK, but twenty-five years later? I don’t buy it.

Still, The Reapers are the Angels isn’t really science-fiction; rather, it’s a reflection on what it means to be a person, on responsibility, on gratitude, and on justice versus mercy. Temple’s going to stick with me for a while, I think.

Tactics vs. Mechanics

John C. Wright has posted a fascinating discussion of how human society works. He points out that we tend to think of human society like a machine. If we want to have a society that runs smoothly, we analyze the problem as an engineer would and try to come up with a carefully engineered solution. And just as our science and technology continues, year by year, to improve, we expect our society to progress, to improve, to get better, as we work the bugs out.

The trouble is, it ain’t so, no how, because we aren’t dealing with impersonal laws of nature; we’re dealing with people. And when people realize that someone is trying to engineer their behavior, they tend to throw a spanner in the works.

Here’s a simple example from present day society. Ten or twenty years ago, someone observed that people tend not to make eye contact in elevators. Everyone gets in the elevator, and they all face the doors and don’t look at each other. Having read this, I kept my eyes open and observed that it was largely true, at least in the elevators I was in. But that was then. Now it’s become a commonplace that everyone behaves this way; and what do I see? Nowadays, people tend to stand with their backs to the walls of the elevator, facing in toward the center. Only those away from the walls face the door.

When people are told how they tend to behave, that makes them self-conscious and they start to behave differently.

A similar pattern occurs in war. It’s famously been said that no battle plan survives contact with the enemy; that’s why they are called the enemy. In any war, the tactics you adopt depend on what you think your enemy is likely to do. There’s no one proper tactic or set of tactics that will serve in all times and places. The engineering model simply doesn’t apply.

And that’s Wright’s point. The problem of having good government and a just society is much more like fighting a war—against venality, corruption, and tyranny, or what Wright terms the Leviathan problem—than it is like engineering a machine. It’s a thought well-worth contemplating.

The Franchise Affair

In a few weeks, Julie & Scott’s A Good Story is Hard to Find podcast will concern Josephine Tey’s mystery The Franchise Affair. I read through Tey’s entire oeuvre quite a few years ago now, and enjoyed them considerably; and they’ve been sitting on my shelf untouched ever since. And as it happens, The Franchise Affair is the first of Tey’s books that I read. And as it further happens, I’m home with a cold. All in all, this seemed a fortuitous time to renew the acquaintance. And when I opened the book, I ran headlong into this line on page 5, which reminded me why I was so enchanted with Tey to begin with. This is in a small English town, circa 1950:

…the scarlet and gold of an American bazaar flaunted its bright promise down at the south end, and daily offended Miss Truelove who ran the Elizabethan relic opposite as a teashop with the aid of her sister’s baking and Anne Boleyn’s reputation.

Leonard Warren

I have just discovered that one of my favorite albums is available on iTunes: Lebendige Vergangenheit — Leonard Warren (Vol.2). Leonard Warren was a mid-20th century operatic baritone; he died young, 49 years of age, in 1960. He was reasonably famous at the time.

This album, however, is not an opera album. Rather, it’s an album of sea shanties, folk songs, and Kipling poems set to music, sung by a man with a huge voice and amazing expression. His recording of “The Battle Hymn of the Republic” will lift you right out of your seat. If you think that “Blow the Man Down” and “The Drunken Sailor” are old chestnuts, you’ve not heard Warren sing them.

The whole album’s great, but my two favorite pieces on the album are by Kipling: “Gunga Din” and “Boots”. The latter is from the point of view of a British soldier serving in Africa. Soldiers in those days got from place to place by marching, and Africa is a big place. Soldiers marched for thousands of miles. And there’s nothing to see as you march but “Boots, boots, boots, boots, going up and down again, and there’s no discharge in the war!

Seriously, get this album…either from iTunes, or, if you prefer, from Amazon. (Note, I don’t get any kickbacks.)

Podcasting

So I’ve recorded a couple of bits for Julie’s Forgotten Classics podcast, “Jabberwocky” and “How the Whale Got his Throat”, and I thought I’d make some technical notes, never having done this before.

I recorded the two bits using GarageBand, which has a podcast setup; it seems to work just fine, and I think I’ll stick with it for the time being. My microphone was a cheap headset that I got with a copy of Rosetta Stone last year; it worked out OK, but I thought the result was rather noisy. Later, I went back and did some experiments, using the headset’s earphones to monitor the sound as I was recording…and, oh, yeah, it’s noisy. Here’s what I got:

  • A rather loud hiss.
  • A periodic beep, beep, beep, beep.
  • Every little noise uttered by my sons in the next room.
  • My every breath and plosive, whether I wanted them recorded or not.

By playing around with GarageBand, and a little judicious Googling, I found a filter called Speech Enhancer that masks out noise; it dealt with the first two, and maybe the third, but not the last. For such a little microphone, it picks up everything in the room.

So, after some more judicious Googling I ordered a new mic, a “Blue Snowflake“. It’s a portable USB microphone made precisely for podcasting and the like, by an outfit I’d never heard of that makes professional microphones. I’ve done some limited experiments with it, but so far I’m quite pleased. The hiss is still there, but is rather quieter, and the annoying beep, beep, beep is gone. It’s a directional mic, so noises elsewhere in the house are less of an issue, and as I can place it one to two feet from my mouth plosives aren’t an issue. Very cool; I’m looking forward to using it.

Fifteen Vocalists in Fifteen Minutes

Julie just did a meme, and tagged me:

From a Facebook thing I got tagged with, but I’m sharing it here also. I found it interesting to see what vocalists swam to the surface of my mind when I was just staring at the sky and thinking about music.

The rules: Don’t take too long to think about it. Fifteen vocalists that will always stick with you. List the first fifteen you can recall in no more than fifteen minutes. And in no particular order. Tag fifteen friends.

Here are my fifteen:

  1. Ian Anderson
  2. Al Stewart
  3. Pete Townshend
  4. Bob Dylan
  5. Maddy Prior
  6. Leonard Warren
  7. Johnny Cash
  8. Arlo Guthrie
  9. Pete Seeger
  10. Allan Sherman
  11. Levon Helm
  12. Bruce Springsteen
  13. Harry Belafonte
  14. Mark Knopfler

I confess I looked at my iTunes library to complete this, as there were names from Julie’s list that were rattling around in my brain that I wouldn’t have picked.

Forgotten Classics

Blog-friend Julie Davis has, in addition to her
Happy Catholic blog, a podcast called Forgotten Classics in which she reads aloud a variety of obscure but entertaining works from the public domain. I confess that I have never listened to Forgotten Classics; my daily commute is about ten minutes each way, and I can’t pay attention to a podcast while I’m writing software at work. Despite that, I’ve embarked on a bit of an endeavor; I’m going to be recording a few classics of my own, which Julie has graciously offered to host. The first, my overly dramatic reading of Lewis Carroll’s “Jabberwocky”, is now available, both at the Forgotten Classics blog, and through iTunes. Give it a listen!

On Evil

From my quote journal:

Charles Williams, in his analysis of the fall and of redemption, points out that when man learns from the devil to know good and evil, this involves his coming to see good as evil; there is nothing but good for him to see or know. If he is to know evil, it can only be by a distorted vision of what is good. That is how evil is conceived and, in due time, brought to birth.

— Simon Tugwell, The Beatitudes

And it is by a distorted vision of good that we choose what is good at the wrong time, or in the wrong way, or in the wrong amount, or for the wrong reason, or by the wrong means.