Unknown's avatar

About wjduquette

Author, software engineer, and Lay Dominican.

Redwall, by Brian Jacques

If you’ve got kids of the right age, you’ve probably heard of
Redwall; not only is it a popular and still growing
series, but the first book was made into a PBS TV show. That’s
where David first encountered it, and he was too excited for
words to find out that we actually had a copy of the book for
me to read to him. It took us the tail end of September, all of
October, and the first few days in November, but by golly we
did it.

A quick plot summary: the peaceful mice of Redwall Abbey are
known all over the countryside for their willingness to help others.
But an evil rat, Cluny the Scourge, is coming with his horde; he wants
to take Redwall Abbey for his castle. The Abbey was founded in part by
the great warrior mouse Martin, who defended it and then pledged himself
to peace. Now a young mouse, Matthias, must find Martin’s armor and
sword, and take up arms to defend Redwall as Martin did. So it’s about
knights and armor and derring do and battles and brave scouting missions;
it’s a coming of age story, naturally; and since it’s written for kids
there’s lots of good stuff about the importance of forgiveness and
turning enemies into friends. Martin succeeds, of course, and a great
celebration is enjoyed by all.

I find I need to approach this review from two points of view,
David’s, and my own.

David loved it. He was thrilled. I couldn’t possibly have had a
better audience. If Redwall the novel has any faults,
David was immune to them.

Now, my point of view. I bought our copy of Redwall
some years ago; I often like kid-lit if it’s done well. I liked it,
with caveats, but didn’t feel at all motivated to by any of the
other books in the series.

Nothing about this reading changed my mind. The writing isn’t great.
The prose frequently edges into the purple; a good editing could make
it a much cleaner, crisper read. The plot is rather contrived.
The quest for Martin’s sword involves hints which require Martin to
have been seriously prophetic, for which no decent explanation is given.

The laws of physics get stretched in a cartoon-like way far more often
than I like. And no, I’m not being overly critical here. It’s one thing
if the laws of physics are stretched by magic–that’s part of the story.
So are talking mice who live in an abbey. But in this case, they are
simply stretched to make the story work properly.

I can almost hear the author saying, “Yeah, that’s implausible, but the
kids won’t care.”

And he’s probably right a lot of the time. But I think that books for
younger readers must play fair and follow the rules. The author is
free to set the rules; and one of the rules for Redwall is
that it’s a world more or less like our own. The rules of physics apply.
To break them just to make the story come out is an insult to the readers
and an unwarrantable liberty on the author’s part–the more so as
(given its vocabulary) Redwall is clearly aimed at the teen
market. These kids are smart enough to notice these things.

It doesn’t really read-aloud well, either (most flaws are at their most
visible when read aloud), and it doesn’t break up into nice chunks for
for bedtime reading. You finish a chapter with Matthias in a serious
cliffhanger, and it doesn’t get resolved until a full chapter later, for
example. Plus, the chapter lengths vary widely. I can’t really criticize
these last two points so much, though, as it just reflects that
Redwall is really a book for much older kids.

Now, there’s a lot to like here as well. The plot is fine, and the
storytelling was adequate. I wasn’t writhing in bored horror as I read
the tale to Dave. Jacques clearly accomplished what he set out to do.
But I really wish the writing was better and the solutions a little
less strained.

I believe this was Jacques’ first book; it may be that his writing
improves in the subsequent volumes. I have every reason to expect that
I’ll find out…but it’s with a sigh of relief that I remember that
we’ll be starting Prince Caspian tomorrow night.

The Seven Samurai, by Akira Kurosawa

The Seven Samuria is a good flick. Dave Jaffe brought it over on
Friday night, and we watched it and ate popcorn and (it’s a loooong show)
I went to bed rather later than I usually do. I’m afraid I’m not enough
of a film buff to understand why it’s considered such a classic, though
I will say that Kurosawa certainly understood how to let the images tell
the story. The dialog is kept to a minimum, and used pretty much only to
impart information that couldn’t be gotten across visually. The acting
was good, too, with the exception of the early scene where the villagers
are falling all over themselves emotionally because the bandits are
coming. That was a little too far over the top, a little too pathetic
for words.

If you’ve never seen The Seven Samurai, as I hadn’t, a plot
summary would be helpful.

You see, there’s this small community that’s being preyed upon by
bandits. The bandits are just waiting for the harvest before they make
another attack; until harvest, the community won’t have anything worth
stealing. The community sends out one of their number, a
positive-thinking if slightly odd fellow, to go find some warriors to
protect them from the bandits. He finds a troupe of warriors and brings
them back home, only to find out that they are in fact a troupe of
travelling circus performers. Still, with luck and a little ingenuity,
they manage to drive off the bandits for good, and all is well.

Oh, wait…that’s not The Seven Samurai, it’s A Bug’s Life.
The Seven Samurai is somewhat different–the village sends out
several men who manage to enlist one samurai, who enlists the others
needed, and the successful battle owes everything to the skill of the
samurai and little to any particular peasant. There’s no “Flick the Ant”
in this movie. But there’s a distinct family resemblance.

And I guess that just goes to show how influential Kurosawa is.

Bolinda

“From what I just read, she was enough.”

“Enough to be getting started with, I guess. You can’t run a sideshow
with only one attraction.”

“But what an attraction!”

“That’s true. She was the foundation of his fortune, right enough.
‘Course, she ruined him too.” Hank leaned over and spat in the can by
the wood burning stove, then tipped back in his chair, front legs off
of the floor. “You never saw her, I collect?”

“You know I never did, Hank. That was all before my time. Hasn’t
been a carny through here since I was a boy.”

Hank nodded. “Has been a long time at that. Used to be we’d get ’em
three times a year, spring, summer and fall, like clockwork. All us
boys’d skip school to watch ’em set up. ‘Cept in the summer, of
course, there was no school in the summer in those days. We’d sneak
into the sideshow to see the geek, and have nightmares for days. I
recollect how Bobby Hill terrified our entire boyscout troop with
a dead chicken head after that. But I’m rambling. It gets that way
after a while….”

“So go on about Bolinda, Hank.”

“Oh, yes, Bolinda of Bolivia, the Living Atlas. ‘Course, she was
really from Brooklyn, but it’s not like anyone was paying to hear her
speak. They had this booth, d’ye see, a big booth with canvas all
round, open to the sky, and a little stage at one end, with a curtain
behind it. You’d pay your nickel to get in, and then she’d come out
from behind the curtain wearing a few inches of cotton. ‘Tain’t
nothing to what what you see on TV these days, like that Pamela
Anderson, but let me tell you back then it was hot stuff, with North
and South America curving down one side, and Africa on the other. All
us boys knew that after supper they did a special show, where you paid
50 cents and got to see the Azores, and maybe even Australia. We
thought a lot about Australia in those days. Never met anybody who’d
actually seen the special show, though some boys liked to claim they did.”

“So how did she ruin him?”

“Well, it was the drinking, wasn’t it.”

“She was an alcoholic?”

“‘Twasn’t so much that as the beer. You throw back enough sixpacks
while sitting on your little stool behind the curtain, and it’s bound
to have an effect. Got so she’d come out from behind the curtain in
stages, like the phases of the moon, and then she’d be so tipsy she’d
kind of sway. We’re not as scientifically backward out here as the
cityfolks like to think, but I guess twarn’t no one wanted to see
continental drift up close and personal.” Hank spit into the can
again. “I finally got to see Australia when I was in the Navy. It’s
a fine place, but it didn’t have a patch on old Bolinda.”

Halloween

Traditionally on Halloween we pack up the kids and go
over to my oldest boy’s best friend’s house and go trick-or-treating with
them in their neighborhood where they have little amenities like street
lights. This year was no exception, but thanks to a lingering cold I
declined to follow the crew about the streets. Instead, I and Dave’s
best friend’s dad (who is also named Dave, and who is also getting over a
lingering cold) spent a pleasant evening sitting in front of the fire and
chatting. Colds to the side, it turned out to be quite a nice time.

Ex Libris Delayed

Ex Libris Reviews
will likely be a day or so late this month; I usually put it together
over the weekend, and what with Halloween and with the 1st of November
falling on a Friday, and travelling at the beginning of the week and
this and that and the other thing, things are moving slowly chez
Duquette. I’ll try to have it out by Saturday evening.

Breaking the Maya Code, by Michael D. Coe

This book is a popular survey of Mayan archaeology, with the decipherment
of Mayan writing being the uniting theme. The topic may sound dry, but
the book isn’t–because it’s really the story of people. It’s the tale
of the Mayans themselves, of course, but even more of the wide and varied
cast of characters who have studied them over the last five-hundred years.
And unlike the decipherment of Egyptian hieroglyphics, which was
accomplished (with the help of the Rosetta Stone) by the great
Champollion in two busy years, the decipherment of the Mayan script took
many strange turns and odd directions courtesy of the many strange and
odd people who have studied it.

It’s a surprisingly engaging tale–this is my second time through it, in
fact. I learned quite a bit about the Mayans, dispelling quite a few
myths, but also about language and writing systems in general (by the
end, our alphabet alphabet seems a thing of wonder).

It’s also something of a cautionary tale about trends in academia. The
Old Guard in Mayan Archaeology had decided that Mayan script was
“ideographic”, that is, that each glyph corresponded to a particular
idea, rather than to any particular word. The same has often been said
of Egyptian writing, and Chinese as well, and it turns out that it’s
hogwash. Every writing system known encodes spoken language, and every
writing system known has a phonetic component. In Mayan script, for
example, a jaguar’s head might be used to mean “jaguar”, but it might be
used purely for the sound of the word “jaguar” as part of another word.
If we wrote English the way the Mayans wrote their language, we might use
a glyph that looked like a cat to mean “cat”, but also as the first sound
in “catapult”, “cattle”, “category”, and so forth.

This has been known to be true for Egyptian, for example, since the
mid-nineteenth century; the Old Guard’s ideas were 50 years out of date
even at the beginning of this century. And although the first successful
phonetic decipherment of Mayan script was done in 1952, it was thirty
years before that small beginning was able to blossom and bear
fruit–largely because the staunchest member of the Old Guard was dead
by then.

Anyway, it’s a cool book. There’s a second edition out, with more
pictures than I’ve got in mine; I should probably find a copy.

I’m Back

Well, I’m back from yet another trip to Goldstone Deep Space
Communications Complex, the pride of the Mojave Desert. This time I
stayed at the Landmark Inn in beautiful downtown Ft. Irwin. That’s
Ft. Irwin the military base. It was a nice place to spend the night (the
shower took no liberties), but
I felt a little odd surrounded by hundreds of fit, athletic young folks
in camouflage, especially as I am by no means fit, athletic, or (by
comparison) young. Anyway, posts will resume as usual now that I’m back.

The Tide of Victory, by Eric Flint and David Drake

This is the fifth book of Flint and Drake’s “Belisarius” series, now
finally available in softcover; I reviewed its four predecessors last
fall. For those who’ve joined us since then, it’s an alternate history
series with a fun but goofy premise. Evil people from the far future
have sent an artificially-intelligent computer called “Link” to Earth in
the days of Byzantine Emperor Justinian I and his highly-competent general
Belisarius. Link’s goal, naturally, is to so adjust Earth’s history that
its creators ultimately end up on top of the kind of world they like.
Pursuant to this, Link has caused the founding of the Malwa Empire in
India. The goal of the Malwa empire, naturally, is to take over the
world in the most brutal and inhuman way possible, all under the
guidance of Link. This is a series with White Hats and Black Hats, and
the Black Hats (with the exception of a few misguided souls who
eventually come ’round) are very Black indeed. It’s not enough for them
to have evil ends; they must have despicable means as well.

On the other side you’ve got General Belisarius and his happy, jovial
crew of soldiers of all kinds. Belisarius is accompanied by another
visitor from the far future, the crystalline entity called “Aide”.
Unlike the inhuman, emotionless machine-entity Link, Aide is funny,
sarcastic, and caring by turns–but Aide is equally determined to see
Link fail. Naturally, both Link and Aide give advanced technology and
tactical tips to their teams. The difference is, of course, that fascist
Link wishes to control the flow of information whereas Aide is happy to
give Belisarius and his followers anything they can possibly use.

Unsurprisingly, competence, good humor, and the free flow of ideas is
going to triumph over evil totalitarianism, and this is book in which we
begin to see it happen. Like it’s predecessors, it’s a rollicking good
time; the good guys beat the bad guys six ways from Sunday, the villains
get theirs in suitably ironic fashion, and so on and so forth–though
there are some surprises.

There will be at least one more book in the series, in which Link and the
Malwa Empire will presumably be destroyed; it’s to be called
The Dance of Time.

If this sounds like anything you’d enjoy reading, I think you’ll enjoy it
quite a bit. I did.

The Pedant Errant: Beauty and the Beast

As everyone with
children already knows, Disney has just released Beauty and the
Beast
on DVD. My kids had never seen it, and as it truly was the
great musical (animated or otherwise) of its day Jane nabbed a copy the
next time she visited Costco. We watched it over a couple of nights,
breaking just after the stunning “Be Our Guest” sequence, and a good time
was had by all. It was better than I remembered, and actually deserves
most of the hoopla.

But then I got to thinking–it’s a chronic problem I have–that the story
as presented simply doesn’t make sense. I’ll grant you the basic
premise: the prince is an arrogant, inhospitable, bad-tempered swine; he
refuses shelter to an ugly old woman; the woman turns out to be a
beautiful enchantress and casts a spell on him, making his poor character
manifest to all. I’ll even buy the time limit on breaking the spell,
though it serves no real purpose but to add suspense.

So we’re expected to believe that a prince–a son of the King
of France–is turned into a loathsome beast (the members of his
household being turned into useful household objects) and nobody in the
wider world notices? OK, so the castle’s enchantment includes a spell of
forgetting on the surrounding countryside…you’d still think his mother
the Queen would notice when he didn’t come home for Christmas. A Prince
of the Blood Royal would be one of the leading citizens of France, and
his disappearance would leave an unmistakeable chasm in the political
landscape.

Well…perhaps this is France way back in the Dark Ages. The prince’s
father isn’t really the King of France; he’s just a minor king of a small
region. Well and good–but the setting is clearly post-Renaissance. We
can tell that from the vast quantities of printed books alone, if the
architecture of the Beast’s castle wasn’t a dead giveaway. And then,
Belle’s father’s inventions bring it to the verge of the industrial
revolution. So this isn’t a tale of the Dark Ages; this is a tale of the
days when France was already a major European power.

After that, the incongruities keep piling up.

This is France; how come the only ones with French accents are Lumiere
and his girlfriend the feather duster?

And what are Cogsworth and Mrs. Potts doing in the prince’s
service? Unlike anyone else in the movie they are clearly English in name
as well as accent. England was, more often than not, the enemy in this
period of history.

Where’s the rest of the prince’s household–his secretary, his courtiers,
his sycophants and hangers-on, and, for that matter, where are his
guards?

When the ugly witch came, what was the prince doing answering his own
door? He had servants for that.

Where does all the food come from? Are the villagers still making
deliveries? If so, they aren’t admitting it.

Once the spell is broken, what is the prince going to use for candlesticks,
teapots, wardrobes, clocks, and feather dusters?

Belle’s father strays into the castle environs by accident on his way to
the Fair. How come nobody else from the village was going?

Belle visits the village bookseller. He’s got a sizeable shop with lots
of books. Who buys them? It’s a very small town; Belle is considered
unusual because she’s a woman who reads; the men seem to spend all their
time in the tavern swilling beer with Gaston. How come the bookseller
hasn’t gone out of business?

And then consider Gaston, the mighty hunter, he who uses antlers in all
of his decorating–where on earth is he finding the deer? We’re well
into the period in history where any deer in France would be dwelling in
the Royal Woods, protected by the Royal Gamekeepers, to be hunted only by
the Royal Monarch and his friends and family. Gaston is awfully
well-respected in the village for a poacher, especially as the prominent
display of antlers all over the tavern might be enough to bring the
King’s wrath down on the entire town.

Aha! Now we’re getting somewhere. Clearly the Beast–the Prince that
was–is out of favor with his father the King. He’s been banished to a
castle in a remote part of France where he can dwell in moderate comfort
with a minimum of staff. The greater part of French society has
endeavoured to forget him entirely; consequently, his rebirth as a Beast
goes unremarked. The local villagers notice, of course, and being canny
peasants immediately determine to make the best of it. With the Beast in
seclusion, there’s nothing to prevent them from taking to themselves as
many of the local Royal perquisites as they can grab, the King’s Deer
chief among them.

The result is peace and prosperity–wealth, even–for
the village. This is evident from the hustle and bustle in the opening
scenes of the movie, but even more so from the lack of children. I don’t
recall seeing a single person under marriageable age in the entire flick
except for Mrs. Potts’ kid Chip. And of course it’s well known that
family size is correlated with wealth.

So the villagers are all perfectly familiar with the terms of the
enchantment. So no wonder they call Belle’s father crazy when he talks
about the Beast–Belle and her father are newcomers, and are outside the
Conspiracy of Silence that protects the village’s prosperity.

This in turn explains Gaston’s determination to marry a girl who clearly
detests him–she’s the only young woman in the village who might see
beyond the Beast’s exterior and so break the spell. Once married, she’s
no longer a candidate (another incongruity! This is France, after all).
And then, when it becomes clear that the secret is out, Gaston and the
villagers seek to solve the problem by killing the Beast once and for all.

It doesn’t work, of course; Gaston falls to his death, the other
villagers are driven away by the Useful Household Items, Belle announces
her love, and the Beast changes back into a (not particularly
handsome–didja see the size of his nose?) Prince. Belle weds the
Prince, and they live happily ever after.

By themselves, in a castle in a remote part of France, forbidden ever to
return to Paris. It’s a good thing Belle likes to read, that’s all I can
say.