And still more.

Dorothy Dunnett: And particularly the Lymond Chronicles and the House of Niccolo series. I enjoyed these books quite a bit, once upon a time. Dunnett’s research is amazing, and she has a real knack for bringing the past to life. But I’ve also gotten tired of not really knowing what on earth is going on for books on end; plus, she’s guilty of what I call “character abuse”: she seems to be constitutionally unable to let her characters be happy for any length of time—unless she’s planning on pulling the rug out from under them. They just can’t win. (Kathryn Kurtz did the same thing in her later books, which is one reason why I don’t read her anymore.)

On the other hand, I’m keeping Dunnett’s King Hereafter, which is a neat retelling of the story of Macbeth. Good stuff…and not interminable.

Bernard Cornwell: I got the first five of Cornwell’s Sharpe’s Rifles books quite a while ago now, at about the same time as I read Dunnett. There are additional books in the series, and many other books by the same author, but I’ve never felt moved to read any of them, nor to re-read the ones I have. Out they go!

Ted Sturgeon: Some years back, when I was buying books in job lots, I got the first five volumes of Sturgeon’s complete works, mostly on the strength of two stories: “Killdozer” and “The Microcosmic God.” As I read them, I found that I really liked those two stories; his earlier stuff was nothing special, and his later stuff, where he started getting more experimental, I didn’t like. Consequently, I’m keeping the two volumes with the stories I like, and I’m getting rid of the other three.

Two more bags….

Sherman continues marching through the Georgia of my bookshelves, throwing the rear area of my mind into considerable disarray. In the process, I’ve chosen to get rid of some more books:

Stephen R. Donaldson: Donaldson is the author of the Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, an epic fantasy that people I knew either loved or hated. The main character is, literally, a leper; and near the first book he commits a brutal rape. There are reasons—not excuses or justifications, mind you—and that’s where most of the ladies dropped the book. There were good things in it, though, past that. The second book was spotty, but the third was really amazingly good. I liked them all well enough that I got the complete set in hardcover.

The Second Chronicles of Thomas Covenant followed some time later, and they were….a disappointment. Donaldson cashed in all of the checks he’d written in the first trilogy, describing all of the strange and far off places and peoples he’d hinted at, and frankly the detail was a lot less interesting than the hints. I bought the books in hardcover, expecting to love them, but I don’t think I’ve read the last book of the three more than twice. In fact, I don’t think I finished it the second time. I can’t imagine attempting them again.

After that, or possibly between the First and Second Chronicles, Donaldson wrote Mordant’s Need, a pair of massive novels that I also bought in hardcover. The first of the two is very slow; the second picks up quite a bit, as all of the things set up in the first begin to pay off. Alas, I can’t imagine re-reading the second without re-reading the first to remind myself what all was going on; and I can’t imagine re-reading the first at this late date.

Donaldson’s next series began with a short novel (short! wow!) called The Real Story: The Gap into Conflict, which I bought eagerly in hardcover, and was so repelled by that I got rid of it almost immediately. All I remember is two people on a spaceship, with one of them doing unspeakable things to the other. (Gladly, I no longer remember what those things were.)

After that, I was pretty much through with Donaldson; but the books have been sitting on my shelves unread for probably twenty years. Enough’s enough. I might keep the original Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, but I can’t imagine reading any of the others.

Robert B. Parker: The Spenser novels, of course. I’ve read most of these two or three times, but I’ve not touched them in ages. Parker’s got a real talent, but the books are spotty, and I’m simply done with them.

Michael Moorcock: Moorcock was another favorite of my high school and college years. I’ve always enjoyed the sense that a book I’m reading is part of something bigger, that there’s secret knowledge out there just waiting for me to find the book that contains it, that there’s a fabulous world out there to discover. Moorcock has an amazing knack for fostering this: every one of his books is filled with obscure little references to the other books. Certain odd characters recur, sometimes with slight name changes, from book to book—or seem to recur, as their personalities often differ greatly. Names or plot elements from other books are briefly mentioned here and there. Certain themes are constant.

And yet, eventually I discovered that the apparent unity of Moorcock’s books, the greater world into which they all fit, was really so much smoke and mirrors. The unity was all surface; and more than that, the whole thing was drenched with a cynicism about people and about the whole genre of heroic fantasy that poisoned my enjoyment.

So, around twenty years ago I got rid of my entire collection of Moorcock’s books. And then, around ten years ago his books started coming out in omnibus editions. There were a fair number I hadn’t read, and some that I’d like better than most, and I was curious to see whether my opinion had changed. My thoughts were mixed. Some were better than I’d remembered; some were worse; but in general, no. They’ve been sitting on the shelf waiting to go for a long time.

I’ve since learned that he dislikes Tolkien. Figures.

For what it’s worth, though, I still love Frazetta’s cover for The Silver Warriors.

That’s three more grocery bags full….

For some reason, when getting rid of books I like to mark the occasion. Perhaps because it is like a funeral: even if the departed was a stinker, one still feels the need to say a few words. (Beyond “Good Riddance!”, that is.)

Not all of the books are stinkers, of course. Some are books I simply don’t have room for, or current interest in; some are books are that are good in their own way, but are competing with books that are better; and some simply don’t measure up. One or two were a little two ambitious; and many of this particular set date from a year or so ago when I was buying books about Catholicism in mass quantities. In the course of things, not all of them were keepers.

So here we go.

Girl meets God, by Lauren F. Winner. An interesting book, about a young woman’s journey through Orthodox Judaism to Christianity. I’m not sorry I read it, but I don’t feel the need to hang onto it.

The Players of Null-A, by A.E. Van Vogt. I picked this up at a used bookstore, in order to rectify a hole in my knowledge of the science fiction classics…and then discovered that it was the second Null-A book. I got the first for my Kindle for something like 99 cents; and decided that I rather get the second as an e-book as well. I can re-read it any time I want to, should I ever want to, without it taking up shelf space.

Writing Jane Austen, by Elizabeth Aston. This was a review copy, and I’ve reviewed it, and it was fun.

God’s Battalions, by Rodney Stark. This is a rather contrarian view of the Crusades, in that it doesn’t view the Crusaders as horrible, evil people bringing the scourge of imperialism down on the peaceful Muslims. I rather agree, and I think it’s a view that should be broadcast more widely. But medieval history is not Stark’s field, and I gather from what I’ve read elsewhere that many of his details are, hmmm, controversial, and not in a good way. I think his basic thesis is right, and he makes many good observations, but I’d rather have a book that’s more solid.

The Victory of Reason, by Rodney Stark. I got this one a couple of years ago, but was never able to get more than a chapter or so into it. I don’t think I’ll get back to it.

The Founding of Christendom, Vol. 1 by Warren H. Carroll. This is a fascinating, quite readable history of Christendom from the beginning of the world up through Emperor Constantine. Whereas most historians strive to be “objective”, Carroll writes from an explicitly partisan and Catholic point of view. The resulting is interesting, but I worry that he might have gone too far. I don’t need him to be “objective”, but I’d like him to be objective, and I fear he isn’t. ’nuff said.

Anglicanism, by More and Cross. This is a classic text on classic Anglicanism that I picked up while I was viewing the Tiber with alarm. No need for it, any more.

C.S. Lewis and the Catholic Church, by Joseph Pearce. This text asks the burning question: given that Lewis was a fairly extreme Anglo-Catholic, why didn’t he go all the way? It was interesting read, but I think there’s a certain amount of wishful thinking going on. Whether or no, Lewis didn’t; and speculations on it, though interesting, aren’t timeless.

Saint of the Day, Vol. 1, edited by Leonard Foley, OFM.
Franciscan Saint of the Day, by Patrick McCloskey, OFM. I’ve nothing against these books, which I picked up for a buck each at a used book store, except that I think I’m not likely to read them. The entries are much briefer than I can easily find on-line, and I’m unlikely to read it as a daily devotional.

The Catholic Source Book, by Rev. Peter Klein. Catholicism for Dummies, by Trigilio and Brighenti. Two fine books, both of which were recommended for folks going through RCIA; but I’ve moved beyond that point.

The Rosary Handbook, by Mitch Finley. I’m all for the Rosary, but I found Finley’s book uninspiring. It was long enough ago that I can’t even remember the details.

Simply Christian, by N.T. Wright. Tom Wright is a brilliant scholar, and orthodox by classic Anglican standards; but he’s not Roman Catholic, and unlike Lewis’ Mere Christianity, Simply Christian takes a little too strong a line to be “simply” Christian.

Benedict XVI: An Intimate Portrait, by Peter Seewald. I’m a big fan of Seewald’s two book-length interviews with Pope Benedict, and I’m hanging on to both of them. This book, on the other hand, is fairly dispensable. It has a fair amount of information about the Pope’s life, but most of that appears to have been drawn from the Pope’s own minimal autobiography, which I have (and which is much smaller). It’s of interest primarily for Seewald’s discussion of his own conversion to Catholicism (which occurred as a result of his interviews with then Cardinal Ratzinger) and for his narration of the papal elections. Alas, I need the shelf space.

Theology of the Body for Beginners, by Christopher West. All the cool kids were talking about John Paul II’s Theology of the Body a couple of years ago, and so I picked this up to see what I could learn. I still don’t know; the book defeated me, and after two tries I gave up. It isn’t that it’s a difficult book; it simply didn’t hold my interest.

Holy Sex! A Catholic Guide to Toe-Curling, Mind-Blowing, Infallible Loving, by Gregory K. Popcak, PH.D. Honestly, I don’t know whether this is a good book or not. I picked it up about the same time as Theology of the Body for Beginners, intending to read it after, and there was never an after. Now I’m kind of embarrassed just looking at the subtitle.

De-coding Mary Magdalene, by Amy Welborn. This is one of the many Da Vinci Code debunking books that came out a couple of years ago. Welborn’s a good writer, and quite a sensible person, and I enjoyed the book well enough, but I don’t need to hang onto it.

Praying with Benedict, by Katherine Howard. I was investigating Benedictine spirituality a couple of years ago, and so I picked this up, mostly because it was there. I found it (and a couple of other books in the same series) to be shallow and uninspiring. Your mileage may vary.

The Compact History of the Catholic Church, by Alan Schreck. A little too compact.

Theo-Logic, Vol. I, by Hans Urs von Balthasar. Ignatius Press had a sale, and I got carried away. I simply do not have the background to make sense of this book; and if I ever do, and want to read it, I’m sure I’ll be able to find a copy.

Elementary Training for Musicians, by Paul Hindemith. Moving right along…

The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Learning Latin, by Natalie Harwood. I spent a few hours with this book some years ago. Being a Compleat Idiot, I moved up to Rosetta Stone and Wheelock’s Latin last Christmas, neither of which I’ve stuck with. But if I should choose to get back to Latin, then practically speaking I’d get back to them, rather than this.

The Honourable Company: A History of the British East India Company, by John Keay. An interesting topic, but I never finished the book, and it’s enormous.

The Arms of Krupp, by William Manchester. A fascinating tale, which I made the mistake of trying to read on a flight from Los Angeles to Sydney. I’ve read it; and should I ever want to re-read it the library will have a copy.

Mac OS X for Unix Geeks, by Jepson and Rothman. A fine book, written in October 2002 for OS X 10.2. We’ve all passed a lot of water under the bridge since then, and the book is subject to signicant information decay.

What is History?, by Edward Hallett Carr. I bought this probably ten years ago, and in all that time I’ve never been moved to read more than the first couple of pages. It might be a fine book, but I think I won’t miss it.

The Conquest of the Incas, by John Hemming. I bought this many, many years ago, when I wanted to know a little something about the Conquest of the Incas. Unfortunately, this book contains over 600 pages about the Conquest of the Incas (in small print), which turned out to be more than I wanted to know.

Squeak: Object-Oriented Design with Multimedia Applications Squeak is a Smalltalk-80 programming environment. I bought this book about 10 years ago, as part of my continuing education as a programmer. It is now out-of-date, as Squeak has been continuously in development since then.

iMovie HD & iDVD 5: The Missing Manual, by David Pogue. This one’s only five years old; but it is still many versions out of date. Bye bye!

That’s all for tonight; there will be more as time goes on.

We are drowning in clutter at our house, and things being what they are much of that clutter takes the form of books. (Sigh!) Much though I’d like to have a huge library and keep (almost) all of the books I buy and have them properly catalogued, and all that, there simply isn’t room. The little table by my comfy chair is stack with books, most of which I’ve already read, that I have no room for. It’s time for a purge, and I’m afraid I’m going to need to be more ruthless than in the past. (Consternation! Uproar!)

While looking around my chair, I found three recent novels that I hadn’t reviewed, and I thought I should say a few words about them before disposing of them

Haze, by L.E. Modesitt, Jr. I’m a long time fan of Modesitt; I like his fantasy novels especially, and have re-read many of them multiple times. One could call his work “ethical fantasy” or, in some cases, “ethical science fiction”, because he’s usually exploring different notions of morality, and how our notions of morality can lead us astray. For example, he often has his main characters doing truly awful things for what seem to them (and to the reader) good reasons…and yet, the awful things remain awful things.

Modesitt has a number of series going, but he also has a long-running “series” of unrelated standalone novels, all of which have a similar kind of feel. They are usually science fiction rather than fantasy, and the ethical component is usually stronger than usual. Haze is one of these, and frankly it’s lackluster.

A powerful, militaristic space empire sends out an agent to the planet Haze, where several agents have been lost. Haze is somehow immune to remote sensing, and the militarists just can’t stand not knowing what’s going on there. It’s like an itch they just have to scratch. The agent is immediately picked up by the locals, who insist on educating him in their own peculiar style—and on their ability to destroy any fleet sent against them. Naturally, they have such a capability; naturally, the militarists send a fleet for no particularly good reason; naturally our hero goes native, for no particular reason. There’s a whole lot of going through the motions, here, but not much in the way of substance, and we’ve seen all of the motions in past books. Oh, well.

Slow Train to Arcturus, by Eric Flint and Dave Freer. Flint and Freer specialize in science fiction mixed with low comedy, and this book is no exception. The science fiction aspect is nifty, and involves a new take on a hoary old trope, the generation ship. The problem with generation ships, if you’re wanting to bring human life to multiple star systems, is the time spent accelerating and decelerating. So what you do is make your ship like a string of beads, where each bead is a complete biosphere containing a population of future settlers. When the “train” gets to a star system, one bead is cut off and decelerates, while the rest of the train proceeds.

So much for the science fiction. The low comedy comes in because this particular “train” was used to get rid of wide variety of small but feisty fringe groups, all of whom are seen through the eyes of an alien whose ship discovers the “train”. He has to travel through five or six of the biospheres, gathering hangers-on as he goes to great comic effect.

That’s the idea, anyway; I was unmoved. I found the comedy not particularly funny; I thought the humor and the science were an uneasy mix; and in generally, I can’t see reading it again. Out it goes.

Thunderer, by Felix Gilman. This is the most interesting book of the three. It concerns a young man who travels to the City, a place unlike any I’ve previously read of. The City is enormous: it has so many districts that no one has been to all of them. It has no one ruler; different strong men control different areas. It is seemingly eternal; no one knows of a time when it wasn’t. It is strangely protean. Things change when no one is looking. It is infested by a wide variety of strange gods and demons. There are revolutionaries, whose goal to is map the entire city, and document everything about it in an encyclopedia. There are certain individuals who can some how move through the city, to different places and times, entirely at will, as though the City were some odd mix of Amber and Shadow.

So, an interesting book; an interesting setting; and probably some fodder for my False Religions series, if I cared enough to go back and reread it. But the plot was lacking; I’ve completely forgotten what the climax was about; and I think I will not mourn it when it is gone.