Memorial Day

My father, who passed away last summer, fought in the Pacific during WWII, as the Electrician’s Mate on a destroyer in Bull Halsey’s task group; he used to say that he was the only man on the ship who was willing to climb the mast. Which he had to, because there was a lot of equipment up there. His older brother commanded a tank in Europe, and participated in both the Battle of the Bulge and on Patton’s clandestine raid to save the Lippizaner mares from the Russians.

I have always admired their attitudes about the war. They were boys when the war began, and signed up as they were allowed to. They did intense physical training for the year or so leading up to that, knowing that they’d need to be in good shape to do well. They fought the war as assigned, and saw a great deal of action. They did their best.

And then, when it was over, they came home, and got married, had lots of kids, had successful careers, and just generally got on with things. The war was formative…but it wasn’t central. It formed them; but it didn’t define them. It was a job for which their services were required, and they did it like they did any of the jobs they took on during their long lives–with determination, perseverance, and all necessary skill. And when the job was done…it was done.

And for those who never had the chance to just generally get on with things:

Eternal rest grant unto them O Lord, and let light perpetual shine upon them; and may their souls and the souls of all the faithful departed rest in peace.

The Griffin Mage

Some time ago, Rachel Neumeier sent me a review copy of her first book, The City in the Lake, which I read, enjoyed, and reviewed quite positively. Consequently, when she contacted me recently and asked if I’d like to read her second book, Lord of the Changing Winds, I eagerly said yes.

As it happens, my response to it was mixed. I liked the beginning. I liked the ending. I liked the characters. The middle…I had some trouble getting through the middle. As I wrote to Rachel–we’ve been corresponding, in an extremely occasional and desultory fashion, for around ten years now, so I guess I can call her Rachel–after finishing it, though, I wasn’t sure whether the problem was the book, or an inability to concentrate on my part. (I got an iPhone that weekend. I’m a geek. So sue me.) Consequently, I held off on writing a review, as I didn’t want to review the book unfairly. Meanwhile, my 10-year-old son (who is reading at an 11th-grade level, according to a test they gave him last week) read the book. Well, I say he read the book; it would be truer to say that he devoured it, and wanted to know when we could get the second book in the trilogy.

Much to my surprise, yesterday afternoon I found Land of the Burning Sun (The Griffin Mage: Book Two) at our local Barnes & Noble. I brought it home, and started reading it earlier today. Well, I say I read the book; it would be truer to say that I devoured it, and wanted to know when we could get the third book in the trilogy. (December of this year, evidently.) So at this point, I’m willing to accept that my difficulties with the first book were due to the circumstances in which I read it, rather than with the book itself.

So, what’s it about, I hear you asking.

First, there are the griffins: beautiful, fierce, inhuman, unhuman. Griffins are creatures of Fire and the Desert, which they bring with them wherever they go. They are not comfortable companions for human beings, whom they scorn. The cold mages of the kingdom of Casmantium have maintained a low-level kind of war with the griffins over the centuries; the cold mages (and humans in general) are creatures of Earth, not of Fire, and between Earth mages and the Fire is antipathy and revulsion.

In Lord of the Changing Winds, the griffins come south from their home in the north of Casmantium to make a new home, evidently, in the kingdom of Feierabiand. And one woman, Kes, a peasant and a healer, is taken by the griffins and made to serve their needs. War comes, and Feierabiand and Casmantium must come to blows–with each other, and with the griffins. What does Kes want? And what of Lord Bertaud, trusted envoy of the King of Feierabiand? And what of Kairaithin, the last griffin mage?

Land of the Burning Sands picks up shortly after Lord of the Changing Winds leaves off, but in a different setting and largely with different characters (though Lord Bertaud and Kairaithin have important roles, and Kes appears briefly). The griffins have returned to Casmantium, and bid fair to destroy the kingdom. Gereint, former magic-bound slave and a gifted “maker”, must decide whether to aid the last cold mage of Casmantium against the griffins, at an unknown cost to himself.

What I especially enjoy about these books are the characters, who are complex, surprising, and not infrequently delightful; I especially liked the Lady Tehre, from the second book, a true absent-minded magic engineer and all around neat lady. And the second thing I like about these books are the difficult moral dilemmas the characters are faced with–and that, in general, rather than making the “hard” decisions that work out to their own benefit, they make the truly hard, and right, decisions that require real self-sacrifice and great personal cost.

Rachel’s first book was published for the teen market; these next two are simply labelled “Fantasy”, but there’s nothing in them that would prevent me from giving them to my kids; and there’s a lot of food for thought for them between the covers, as well as a galloping good read.

(On the off-chance that the middle section of Lord of the Changing Winds really is a little slow, stick with it. The ending is worth it, and the second book is definitely good all the way through.)

Dancing With Jesus

The Christian life is like dancing with Jesus. He must lead and we must follow, for only dimly can we hear the music, and the steps are beyond our ken. If we try to lead ourselves we are lost; but if we follow diligently we will learn to dance with grace. In time we might even begin to dance with flair and joie de vivre.

But as we master the steps–as we grow in holiness–so too the dance becomes harder and more complex, and often more painful as well. It is not always pleasant to dance with Jesus. But if we follow as he leads, the dance we dance will be of great beauty for those with eyes to see, and there will be joy in our hearts.

Who Owns the Truth?

The Maverick Philosopher says,

The truth is too magnificent a thing to be the the property of any one institution. Too magnificent a thing, and too elusive a thing to be owned or housed or patented or reduced to the formulas of a sect or finitized or fought over.

In two senses I agree with this, and two senses I do not.

The ultimate truth, worthy of being called Truth with a capital T, is God Almighty. God is infinite, not to be grasped by our limited intellects; and God is certainly not the property of any institution.

More than that, the full truth even of this universe we live in is beyond the grasp of our intellects; though God knows it perfectly. Again, this truth can’t be the property of any institution.

On the other hand….

It’s certainly possible to have a greater or lesser grasp of the truth, in either of the two senses discussed above. Some institutions will have a better grasp of the truth than others. It’s not unreasonable to think that some institution, somewhere, might have a better grasp of the truth than any other. (It’s also not unreasonable to think that many institutions might each have a corner on some particular aspect of the truth.)

Now, suppose God, Infinite Truth, decides to take a hand in things. Suppose He reveals what we need to know. Suppose He guarantees that some institution, specially blessed by Him, will preserve that revelation intact for future generations. I wouldn’t say that this truth is the property of such an institution; it would be better to say that it is held in trust. But surely, in such a case, if such a case there be, it is true to see that this institution has the truth.

And this is precisely what the Catholic Church claims for itself; and this I believe.

I take one further exception to the MP’s statement: that the truth is too magnificent a thing to be fought over. It’s true that fighting a single combat or a war is no way to determine what the truth is. But good grief! If you can’t fight for the truth, what can you fight for?

Under Enemy Colors

Sean Russell, author of The Swans’ War series among other fantasy novels, has begun to turn his hand to historical fiction under the name S. Thomas Russell. His first outing is Under Enemy Colors, a tale of the Royal Navy in the age of sail.

The tale begins shortly after the French Revolution has devolved into a Reign of Terror. The protagonist, Charles Saunders Hayden, is a lieutenant in the Royal Navy. Born of an Englishman and his French wife, Hayden was raised in both England and France and speaks both languages as native tongues. He was in Paris in the days of the revolution, and supported it with joy…until he saw the mob chasing down and killing men guilty only of the slightest rumor of wrong-doing.

Hayden’s English father is long dead; he has no patron; and so his naval career is stalled. Given his skills and accomplishments (he is, of course, a consummate seaman) he should be made a captain; instead, he is offered a position as First Lieutenant to the incompetent, wrathful, and cowardly Captain Hart, whose crew is on the verge of mutiny.

All of this is familiar territory. The question is, how does Russell stack up against those who have ploughed the same stretch of water?

The plot is perhaps somewhat hackneyed: incompetent and detested captain, check, competent and admired subordinate, check, surly, dissatisfied crew, check, the Rights of Man, check, mutiny, check, heroic deeds, check, court martial, check, vindication, check; given the premise, it could hardly go any other way. When one sits down to a book of this kind, one knows what one is getting. But not all sea voyages from hither-to-yon are created equal, and it’s the scenery and incident along the way that make the trip.

On the whole, I have to say that I think he’s a better writer than C.S. Forester. Hayden strikes me as a more complex character than Horatio Hornblower; with his mixed parentage he is indeed a kind of composition of Jack Aubrey and Stephen Maturin. He’s also better, I think, than Alexander Kent, author of the Bolitho series. On the other hand, he’s not Patrick O’Brian…but no one is, so that’s hardly surprising. (NB: I read O’Brian before I read Forester; perhaps if I’d read them in the other order I’d have a higher regard for Forester. As it is, I found him lacking.)

The second book in the series, A Battle Won, is due to be released in hardcover this August. I’m looking forward to reading it, though probably not until it comes out in paperback.