The Runelords, by David Farland

This is the first book in a series, and I’m following the usual
pattern–each time a new volume comes out, I end up re-reading the whole
set. By the time I read the Nth book, I’ve read the 1st book N times.
This was the third time for this particular book, and rather surprisingly
I was pleasantly surprised. I liked it the first time I read it; was
rather unimpressed the second time; and this time I rather liked it
again. I think it’s partially because the second time I was rushing
through it; this time I took it easy.

The world of The Runelords is based on elemental magic. The
world is out of balance; Fire is becoming too powerful, and as a result
the insectoid “reavers” are pouring out of the earth and slaying humans
right and left. Prince Gaborn val Orden is chosen by the Earth to be the
“Earth King”; it’s his job to try to preserve a remnant of mankind from
the reavers. His success is by no means guaranteed (except by narrative
causality…); in similar circumstances, older races have perished.

There’s a hitch, of course. Raj Ahten, a king from the lands to the
south, is trying to conquer the entire continent. His stated goal is to
unite the continent under his rule, to better handle the threat from the
reavers. But in fact, he’s fallen in love with the destruction and
humilation he’s causing everywhere he goes; the reavers are secondary.
Gaborn must somehow save himself and those he loves from Raj Ahten, while
not neglecting the reavers.

That’s the overall conflict, but it’s obscured by the most unusual
characteristic of the world Farland has created. Given a magical
branding iron called a forcible and someone who knows how to use it, one
can “take an endowment” from another person. That is, one can borrow the
other person’s wit, or their brawn, or their hearing, or any of a dozen
other qualities. It’s a permanent loan, lasting until the death of
either party. And, naturally, the person who gave the endowment no longer
has the use of it. Those who give brawn are to weak to move; those who
give metabolism sleep as if drugged; those who give wit become stupid;
those who give glamour become ugly.

Farland’s taken this simple idea, and worked out all the logical
consequences. The noble class–the Runelords–take endowments as a
matter of course. It’s not uncommon for a King to be more powerful
than any of his knights, simply because he’s taken more endowments. But
every king has counsellors, knights, soldiers, scouts, and so forth who
have taken endowments as well. Thus, the central keep in any castle
is the Dedicates’ Keep, where those who have given endowments live and
are cared for. Kill a King’s dedicates, and you’ve hamstrung him.

On first reading, this was the bit that I focussed on. It wasn’t until
this time around that I realized that although endowments are a central
fact in this world, they aren’t the point of the story.

This isn’t a truly classic high fantasy series, but it’s good fun. I’m
looking forward to the next book.

Father’s Day

My going-on-four-year-old made me a card at preschool. The teacher asked him some fill-in-the-blank questions, and wrote down his answers, which I present herewith. The questions are in italics, and his answers in normal type.

My Daddy’s name is Daddy.

He is I don’t know years old.

He has green eyes and black hair. [Brown hair, really. Mostly brown, these days.–ed.]

He likes to eat dinner, breakfast. That’s what he likes.

He likes to watch actually, commercials on TV. [I do? –ed.]

When he goes to work, he works at work.

I love my Daddy because I do.

It’s good to be Dad.

Carry On, Jeeves, by P.G. Wodehouse

This is yet another book of Jeeves and Wooster stories, old favorites all
of them. It’s notable for having two unusual stories: the tale of how
Jeeves first came to be Bertie Wooster’s valet, and a tale (the only one,
so far as I know) told from Jeeves’ own point of view. I remember when I
first read that one–it’s funny, but it’s also a bit of a shocker. You
get to find out what Jeeves really thinks about his employer, and the
lengths to which he’s willing to go to maintain the status quo. He
really doesn’t have Bertie’s best interests at heart.

Ranks of Bronze, by David Drake

This book is the predecessor of David Weber‘s
The Excalibur Alternative, which I reviewed some months ago.
In brief, in Roman times the galaxy is already populated by many advanced
civilizations. A galactic law prohibits the used of advanced weapons on
primitive populations–and the advanced races have little experience of
primitive weapons and aren’t particular interested in acquiring any. One
trading cartel gets a bright idea: they go to Earth, and steal the best
army they can find: a legion of Roman soldiers. And then they deploy
them to fight battles on planet after planet. They are given advanced
medical treatment, so that they don’t age; after battles, any injury (up
to and including death) that doesn’t involve irreparable damage to the
spine or brain is treatable. After a battle they are allowed to rest and
carouse on board ship until everyone’s healed up, and then they are put
to sleep until they reach the next planet. It’s a hell of a life.

It’s interesting to compare this book with Weber’s, and the different
reactions of the ancient Romans and the medieval Britons. The Romans
are, frankly, not at all equipped to know what’s going on. In
particular, they have no notion of planets in the modern sense, of
different “earths”, or of space travel. They have no idea how any of the
things on board the ship work; they simply learn to take them for
granted.

The Britons, on the other hand, are in some degree better educated.
Their leader grasps fairly quickly that they’ve travelled to other
planets; and they are much better at making sense of what they find. And
I’m wondering, now…is this realistic?

It might be. I’ve read that Western science arose from the notion of
certain Christians that God plays fair…that the phenomenal world will
follow rules, and that those rules are understandable by the human
intellect. This is not a Greek point of view; the Greeks thought that
the noumenal or ideal world was the true reality, and that the phenomenal
world was but a semblance. (Archimedes was, obviously, an exception.)
And the Romans who followed inherited much of the Greek world view.

So…would the medieval Brits really be better equipped, by means of
their world view, to cope with such an outlandish situation? Or is Weber
just blowing smoke?

But getting back to Drake’s book…it’s got a lot of gritty, hard-hitting
scenes of warfare, death, and destruction, very little humor, and not
much to recommend it unless you really like military fiction. Drake’s
done much better. Of course, it is one of his older books…

Finding Nemo, Take 2

The problem with doing moving reviews is that I’m not a movie buff. This is especially a problem when I like a movie. If I dislike a movie, I can always find lots of reasons. But if I liked it, all I can say is whether I liked the movie or not, and mention a few bits that were good. I don’t know what it is that makes a movie great instead of just good, or good instead of adequate. I don’t know the terminology or the techniques they use.

Now, I loved Finding Nemo. I see only a few movies a year, and I’m quite satisfied that Finding Nemo is one of them. But as I said, I rate it below Monster’s Inc. and the Toy Story movies. Why? I dunno. If pressed, I probably would have said something about the open ocean not having a lot of scenery, that is, it all tends to look the same. And in my memory, the movie seems kind of slow–which is ridiculous, because it sure didn’t feel like that when I was watching it.

And now Ian Hamet has come along and said the things I would probably have said if I had known then what I know now, and if I knew what was I talking about. I can sum it up in one word: pacing. Or two words: comic timing. In Monsters Inc. and the Toy Story flicks, the timing is perfect. In Finding Nemo, it’s off. And now that Ian’s pointed it out, I can think of bunches of examples (the scene with the whale, for example, dragged, especially the interiors).

And so they achieve most excellent goodness…but not greatness.

Thanks, Ian!

Blandings Castle, by P.G. Wodehouse

This is Wodehouse, so you already know I think it’s the most wonderful
thing since sliced bread. The book includes a number of short stories
set at Blandings Castle, including the first appearance of that majestic
pig, the Empress of Blandings (I especially like “Lord Emsworth and the
Girl Friend”); a Bobbie Wickham story I’m not sure I’d read before; and
Mr. Mulliner’s Hollywood stories.

Every so often I try to explain why Wodehouse is so good, and what makes
him so funny; I don’t believe I’ve ever done him justice. So I’ve
decided to let him speak in his own words, with a few short extracts from
this set of stories:

Lord Emsworth could conceive of no way in which Freddie
could be of value to a dog-biscuit firm, except possibly as a taster; but
he refrained from damping the other’s enthusiasm by saying
so.

* * * * *

It sounded to Lord Emsworth exactly like a snarl. It was
a snarl. Chancing to glance floorwards, he became immediately aware, in
close juxtaposition to his ankles, of what appeared to be at first sight
to be a lady’s muff. But, this being one of his bright afternoons, he
realized in the next instant that it was no muff, but a dog of the
kind which women are only too prone to leave lying about their
sitting-rooms.

* * * * *

His recovery was hastened by…the spectacle of his son
Frederick clasping in his arms a wife who, his lordship had never
forgotten, was the daughter of probably the only millionaire in existence
who had that delightful willingness to take Freddie off his hands which
was, in Lord Emsworth’s eyes, the noblest quality a millionaire could
possess.

* * * * *

Now it has been well said that with nervous, highly-strung
men like Montrose Mulliner, a sudden call upon their manhood is often
enough to revolutionize their whole character. Psychologists have
frequently commented on this. We are too ready, they say, to dismiss as
cowards those who merely require the stimulus of the desparate emergency
to bring out all their latent heroism. The crisis comes, and the craven
turns magically into the paladin.

With Montrose, however, this was not the case. Ninety-nine out of a
hundred of those who knew him would have scoffed at the idea of him
interfering with an escaped gorilla to save the life of a child, and they
would have been right.

Getting Your Book Published

As you know, I recently decided to self-publish my first novel here on my website. It’s a decision that took a long time to make; I do think that Through Darkest Zymurgia! is good enough to be published through the normal channels. The fact is, though, is that so doing is a royal pain.

And in an astonishingly display of synchronicity, over at 2blowhards, Michael Blowhard has written a detailed description of just how and why it’s so difficult.

There’s a lengthy and interesting comments thread, too.